"The Erie Canal"

Political Observations

I have kept my silence too long about politics and our great nation in general.   I start by stating that we are all imperfect human beings in an imperfect world.   In addition, we are a society that in order to live together must obey certain laws of nature and man.   That being said, please read the following from a BLOG.   Having been asked to respond, I believe I must.   Moreover, I will consider any e-mail regarding this HTML page for inclusion as an addendum to this page if I feel it is in keeping with the philosophy that I have spent 66 years observing.   Thank you all in advance for your generous time and observations.  

Quote

Welcome to Fascist America!

My fellow Americans, it’s official now: We live in a fascist nation.

Now, the term "fascist" has been thrown around over the last fifty years in a loose way that has drained it of much of its meaning. If someone wanted to cut 5% off of a leftist professor's favourite welfare programme, the professor would call his opponent a "fascist." I’m not using the word like that. I mean honest-to-goodness, old-fashioned, 1930s style fascism, featuring such old favorites as:

* Secret prisons – they’re back!
* Torture – we’re doing it.
* Spying on all citizens.
* Arrests and indefinite imprisonment without trial.
* Rampant militarism.
* Secret detention.
* Enforced disappearance.
* Denial and restriction of habeas corpus.
* Prolonged incommunicado detention.
* Unfair trial procedures.

(This list was compiled partially based on the work of Amnesty International, available here.)

An absolutely mind-numbing response to complaints that our traditional legal system is being torn apart is the question, "So, you want to protect the rights of terrorists?"

Um, no, I want to protect the rights of non-terrorists who might be falsely accused of terrorism! That was sort of, you know, the whole idea of our legal system. I’m sure there was some neo-con around in the 1700s saying to Jefferson or Madison, "So, you want to protect the rights of murderers and robbers?" but luckily they ignored him.

We’ve now gotten to the point where Nazi Germany was, say, in 1934. Remember, at that time, if you had told a typical German what his government would do over the next ten years, he would have looked at you as a madman. After all, his land had been civilized for over a thousand years. His was the nation of Albertus Magnus, Gutenberg, Goethe, Schiller, Beethoven, Bach, Kant, Hegel, Schelling, Fichte, Heisenberg, Reimann, Mann, Lessing, Herder, Handel, Dürer, Leibniz, Gauss, Helmholtz – he could have gone on, but you get the point. His nation could not possibly descend into barbarism! If you tried to tell him he was living in a police state, he would have pointed out that his government had used its vast new powers very judiciously, and only against a few trouble-makers. So far.

It is interesting, in gauging the direction we are heading, to look at the proclamations of "respectable" opinion writers who support this administration. For instance, we have people at a "libertarian" think tank proclaiming that Moslems are not entitled to full civil rights in the US. (Perhaps we need to make them wear something special on their clothing like, say, a yellow star, so we know just who they are, hey?) But "conservatives" provide even more stunning examples of purely fascist reasoning. For example, conservative demagogue Ann Coulter has called for the editor of The NY Times to face the firing squad for his part in publicizing this administration's abuses of power. Let’s look at a recent column by Douglas MacKinnon at TownHall.com.

MacKinnon considers all of those involved in revealing the sordid collection of secret programmes that have been launched by the Bush administration as "traitors" who have publicized these schemes "purely because they don’t like the policies of the new president." Well, he’s right in that "they don’t like the policies" that they consider unconstitutional violations of our rights. Far from "aiding the enemy," these revelations aided us, the American people, by letting us know what our government has in store for us.

Consider what the point of classifying these programmes was in the first place, and who they were being kept secret from. The jihadists no doubt already knew about the secret prisons – their friends are in them! They surely knew that the war in Iraq has been helping their recruiting – it’s their recruiting! ("Praise be to Allah, Abdul, I read in The NY Times that it is the Iraq War that is sending us these thousands of new recruits – who knew?") They no doubt suspect they may be wiretapped – what they didn’t know was that all the rest of us are, as well. No, not one of these leaks helps terrorists, nor was one of them classified to stop terrorists from finding them out. We were the ones who weren’t supposed to find out about them.

MacKinnon continues: "And if even one American lost his or her life because of a leak, then I would want that person to be executed for treason."

So anyone who reveals our fascist government policies is a traitor who can be executed! This is obviously an attempt to intimidate the opposition so that our police state can be expanded without the annoying work stoppages caused by public outcry when the latest bit of construction is revealed. And just how does MacKinnon propose to show that some American lost his life because a journalist revealed that the US government tortures people across the globe, rather than, say, because the policies he supports have inspired a million new jihadists? Secret trial, perhaps? Or why even bother with trials for filthy traitors?

Herr Goebbels – oops, I mean MacKinnon – writes, "Until we severely punish those who leak classified information, then the traitors among us will not only continue to flourish, but will grow more brazen with the secrets they reveal."

Yes, what we ought to be able to do, you know, is simply seize anyone who even mentions our government’s "secret" prisons, and, without a trial, throw them in a secret prison! This is the logical conclusion of this fascist’s article, after all, since those who talk about the American Gulag are pretty much terrorists themselves.

Folks, this is coming real soon, and, once it does, domestic opposition is pretty much over. One journalist – that will be about all it takes – will be seized as a "terrorist" and thrown in the Gulag. The government may release him, but then another will simply disappear in the night in Iraq or Afghanistan, and rumors will circulate that he is being kept in a cage somewhere and water boarded. No journalist lacking heroic courage will any longer be willing to seriously protest government policy.

America is full of decent people, who could never believe their own government could become fascist. So were Germany and Italy in the 1920s. But they became fascist anyway. They passed laws suspending civil liberties, but the government promised the frightened populace that those laws would only be used against targets like "Communist terrorists." And, a little bit at a time, the target kept getting bigger and bigger, slowly enough that the people who weren’t paying close attention never detected it.

And, next thing you know, there were millions of people dead! So, it turns out, it would have been worth paying attention after all.



End Quote



My response is dedicated to many friends and my wife.  Lois once told me when we were first married over 39 years ago that she didn't care if I had 301 college credits, an M.D., a PhD., an M.A. or a B.A., "You are worthless if you don't have any commonsense."  I'm afraid that many Americans treat politics and life like a cartoon such as Cartman above from South Park.  Unfortunately, the generation gap is even worse.  I am reminded of Ernie Pyle and WWII soldiers that stopped the Italian civilians from tearing a German soldier from limb to limb.  What a contrast to Viet-nam and Iraq!  In Viet-nam, American soldiers brutalized each other.  On the other hand, we supplied soap and toothpaste to leper colonies when I was there.

I can take you to the bottom line immediately as to what is wrong with today's society.  We are observing the breakdown of the core of America, the family.  Both Mother and Father are both out trying to earn a living.  The children are left to fend for themselves.  Enough said.  We need to also improve our education system.  Failing to provide the new generations with the tools to be better Americans is our greatest failure for which we should be thoroughly ashamed.  

Now, a couple of comments regarding the above quote.  I am reminded that the President was elected by the majority for better or worse.  Regardless of the lampooning, harpooning, and general President bashing, it is our responsibility as Americans to support our President.  Most of us are not privy to the inner workings of our government.  Moreover, I deeply sympathize with the President's Father and Mother who are very hurt by media comments against their son.  But we need to remember the acquisition of a B.A. and an M.B.A. at Harvard and Yale are no small feats for a young man.  If you think for a moment that the President doesn't listen to his advisors, you are deluding yourself.  May all Americans be with our President and support our country.  

Some last comments regarding the pendulum as applied to morals, and to our government.  My high school had some great teachers.  My junior year gave me a history teacher who stated that morals in our society are governed by a pendulum.  It swings from strict to permissive behavior on the part of our parents.  Similarly, a friend reminded me that our pendulum applies to our government.  The two party system helps the pendulum swing back and forth between the forces of liberalism and conservatism.  But I am also reminded of the old saying, "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." That is why it is so important to teach good values to the new generation before they turn 13 when their characters are molded.  As my Mother stated, "We make our greatest mistakes through ignorance."  After all, as St. Augustine pointed out, "Evil is the misdirection of our free will."  Remember, "We are not judged by how much we love others, but by how much others love us."  

I have decided to append a personal story about corruption and a U.S. Army supply clerk by the name of SP/4 Samek.  One day, the supply Captain told SP/4 Samek that an inspection of the supply room would take place in two weeks and he wanted SP/4 Samek to get rid of the excess material that was not accounted for.  Of course, SP/4 Samek asked the Captain how he wanted the excess material disposed of.  The Captain replied any way that SP/4 Samek wanted.

The next day, SP/4 Samek drove off base with a trunk load that he sold downtown.  He continued doing this every evening for a week.  At the end of the week, the M.P.s at the gate asked to inspect SP/4 Samek's trunk.  They found the contraband.  They asked what SP/4 Samek was doing with the material.  SP/4 Samek told them what the Captain had said.  The M.P.s said that if the Captain would verify what he had said, they would take it from there.

Of course, when SP/4 Samek asked the Captain to back him up, the Captain denied telling SP/4 Samek any such thing.  Fortunately, the supply room Master Sergeant sitting across from them spoke up and said, "I heard you tell SP/4 Samek to dispose of the excess anyway he wanted, Captain, Sir."  The next day, the Captain was gone and the Master Sergeant told Sp/4 Samek to forget the incident.

Please visit an early American protest group below.
Then visit a current American observation about the draft below.
To return here from either one, just press your BACK button.


ErieCanl.htm
Enlist.htm